Secondly, what made me think deeply is ironically on how the education system "prepares" our students. Rather than the ideal philosophy of mine, the students were rather trained/modified into how society wants them to become so that they can fit into the workforce like how society functions. As the author mentioned that "The school seeks to modify the child's behavior to comply with goals that the child had no hand in formulating and that might not have any intrinsic meaning.", I feel so torn about that statement. A part of me wants students to learn freely and be whoever they want to be, but the other part of me is afraid of the lack of real-life experience /prep they have if I don't give them enough prep for the real world. I think we should find the balance between the two, I don't want our future generation to become robots so that they think and act all alike, but I don't them to be so "unique" that they cannot fit into the real world.
One more point I want to mention is that we should stop using the rewarding system starting at such a young age as I think it's important for kids to know that some qualities like being kind, on-time, and polite, etc. should be a moral thing to do rather than an optional quality of someone.
I'm aligned with BC's curriculum in terms of the goals and rationale and it's also aligned with the author's vision. Thinking mathematically is more important to think about mathematics, thinking mathematically can be applied in other subjects and even in students' lives which is much more valuable in their lives and workplaces in the future!

Beautiful, Zoe! What an in-depth and interesting response to this article. I completely understand the tension between socializing kids so that they can be part of society and allowing them the freedom to be individual and original. There is always some kind of balance needed...The BC curriculum allows for quite a bit of originality, but I don't think it really deals with the problems of competition vs. intrinsic values and morals.
ReplyDelete